Overall Rating 6.7 out of 10 - Show as random as slot machine.
I recommend watching
This is a story about OP dude who can kill anyone by just thinking it and his twin tailed female companion.This blog is about Anime, Music and Video Games. I write reviews, analytical articles and some casual observations. I intend to instill good taste among the shit taste plebs. I also occasionally write about other topics that interest me. I am a writer and promoting my awesome book here, ask me about it.
Overall Rating 6.7 out of 10 - Show as random as slot machine.
I recommend watching
This is a story about OP dude who can kill anyone by just thinking it and his twin tailed female companion.Around 3 years ago I watched a Space Pirate Captain Herlock: Outside Legend - The Endless Odyssey and liked it very much (see review here). I found Herlock to be very likable and relatable.
I wanted to watch the original 1978 version as well but due to various circumstances never came to do it until recently.
I often complain that sequels are not as good as originals. Some do not live to the high mark of their predecessors, other got completely fucked up and corrupted by a different creative team.
The Herlock made of a curious inversion of this rule. I liked new Herlock a lot more than the original one. 2002 Herlock is strong and silent, very introverted and melancholic character who is wise, capable, makes sound and well thought decisions, saves people loyal to him and then universe as well. Herlock of 1978 is by contrast a contrarian who fights against all that is good and somehow calls it freedom.
I only watched up to episode 7 of the original but so far it does not shape up to be good at all. Differences between it and The Endless Odyssey are subtle but significant.
To begin with ideology and world set up. In The Endless Odyssey it was World Government that was hellbent on ending Herlock and all the pirates. They captured Key and most of Herlock's crew and wanted publicly to execute them as a show of force and to intimidate opponents. Herlock merely fought back to save his and his crew's freedom from government oppression.
The Endless Odyssey government was motivated by nothing more than desire to oppress and enforce their evil order against people's will. The Endless Odyssey government ruled over dirt poor wasteland and was a total mess. It was space North Korea, the polar opposite of the utopia that government was in the original Herlock.
In the 1978 original it's not the government that opposes Herlock but its Herlock who oppose government instead. In fact, government is almost happy to leave that Herlock alone, but he keeps bothering them all the time. And the reason he opposed government was nothing less than because it's "too weak and relaxed". Herlock and other characters keep complaining how people on Earth are weak and worthless.
At times the whole 1978 show feels like a cheap advert of "tough times ideology" that is popular with some idiots nowadays. Tough times and toughness do not make anything better, people who believe in benefits of tough times are morons beyond redemption and should all be exterminated.
Thus, when in The Endless Odyssey Herlock called his pirate flag, the Flag of Freedom. It actually meant something. It was a flag of freedom from government jackboots, oppression and poverty.
In 1978 Herlock also calls his flag, the Flag of Freedom but here it does not make any sense at all. What freedom? Herlock does nothing to save Mayu who is being abused because she is his daughter. In fact, he even finds delight in thinking about her suffering. I maybe support BDSM Maledom femsub, but that is not it. Also, no one who deliberately causes suffering to their own children is a decent person. Herlock also puts Daiba in danger and more. He does not fight for freedom; he fights to make people suffer and that is not something I can approve. 1978 Herlock's is not flag of freedom but a flag of suffering. Something neo-Christian cult wants to impose on society.
Speaking of Daiba, in 2002 he is rather unlikable. Overly emotional boor who gets in fights just for the sake of it. I always thought that he is unnecessary character who adds nothing to the story and should not even be in it.
In the original Daiba is not anymore likable but has a much more prominent role. He also looks very much like Herlock himself, as if he is his younger brother or son. This dynamic does not appeal to me at all.
Because of Daiba I was willing to give original Herlock a little more time to develop, thinking that once Daiba ark is over, we will move to the more interesting parts, but as of episode 7 that seems increasingly unlikely.
When it comes to Herlock, then in the 2002 Endless Odyssey he was, a strong and silent Byronic hero type. He was wise, smart, capable and many more. 2002 Herlock travels space, learns secrets of the universe and solves problems for the benefit of himself, his crew and humanity.
Herlock of 1978 is basically a bully and an asshole who lives by some stupid rules that make no sense and believes that comfort is bad.
Unfortunately, Mayu is a kid in original while she was cute teen girl in 2002 Endless Odyssey. Her episodes in the original are unpleasant to watch.
Opponents are also different. In The Endless Odyssey they were ghosts of the past. Dead scientists who opened some ancient vault, got killed, turned into ghosts and now wander the universe, killing people. They were part of Noo, the ancient fear that destroys civilizations. Herlock eventually defeated these outdated fools. I liked it because I like when young prevail over old.
In the original the opponents are women who burn like paper, Mazone. They are pretty and very feminine. Sure, story justify fighting them, but that is still a fight against what is good, beautiful and pleasant. Not something I support.
There are few things that are mostly the same. Both Miime and Key are rather feminine and demure, something I like. Unfortunately, we no longer have the black-haired female assistant to older Daiba.
As of episode 7, original 1978 Herlock is on its way to being dropped with rather low score. I will probably watch a few more episodes to make sure my conclusions I outlined here are correct, but so far it does not look promising at all.
Black pants Herlock of The Endless Odyssey maybe a hero but his washed-up jeans predecessor from original is not. Only the black pants Herlock fights for freedom, the washed-up jeans Herlock only fights for suffering.
Overall Rating 6.7 out of 10 - It misses more than half of the time at predicting future but has good plot.
I recommend watching.
A while ago I reviewed the original Ghost in the Shell movie. I pointed out many of its shortcomings compare to other shows about future technology and implications it will have on humanity.
However, despite other shows doing it better, GitS was first and ended up creating a cult following, others could not muster. There are many sequel movies as well as two full double seasons of episodic series. This is the first season.
To begin with, tech. This show takes original tech of the GitS and further develops on it. That means that there are certain things that as a moment of writing this review are not yet available for humanity. At the same time certain technology that is completely ubiquitous to us is conspicuously absent in this show. For example, one can easily separate the AI that controls the robot from the physical body of the robot. AI can be uploaded, changed, updated very easily with our current tech. Yet in this movie they had to withdraw all the think tanks just because there was issue with their AI. Other things like hacking electronic eyes with no direct contact yet requiring a wire from one artificial body to another to pass information between people. Technology did not age well in this story.
On the other hand, plot is the best part of the show by far. Executives certainly loved that show and splurged on good writing team. Episodes are diverse and creatively written. Diverse cast of both main protagonists as well as episodic characters they are dealing with. There is even an overreaching plot that connects stretches several episodes and concludes closer to the end. Even if ending somewhat disappointed, I will admit I was curious to learn the truth behind Laughing Man when he was first introduced. After rather early introduction, main plot involving him takes a pause to focus on other things only to resurface at rather unexpected moments.
Characters themselves did not really endear me to them. I could hardly point to anyone I particularly liked. I did not especially dislike anyone either, but overall, they are not my type of crew, there is some subconscious rejection of them. They lack ambition and vision to build something better; they merely work humbly for the cause. Not that an agency like Section 9 needs ambitious people but still. Also, they are far too duty bound, overly subservient to superiors and seem completely lack any personal desires or motivations, they live to serve the state. That is probably why I subconsciously dislike Section 9 as this is an organisation that is ignorant and indifferent to people personal wishes and desires. They are not as free spirited or driven by internal sense of justice as Herlock crew or Black Knights from Code Geass. Neither are they try to indulge themselves in whatever pleasures they can like Lagoon Company.
Main protagonists, including Matoko and Batou, are all members of Section 9. It is an elite force of an internal security or secret police type of organisation, that fights complex crime, stops international incidents, investigate corrupt politicians and businessmen and also fights rival government agencies. It has such an inconspicuous name so that not even their colleagues in police and security know what they really do. They take secrecy very seriously there. Most of the individual episodes revolve around one or the other member of the Section flexing hard their mad skills, for the lack of better description.
Episodic antagonists are diverse, and some are rather interesting like that rich guy who surrounded themselves with robotic maids in his mansion and died long before Section 9 got to him. I wish I could live how he lived.
Laughing man himself ended up rather underwhelming. At first, he was introduced as super hacker with some over-the-top super plan for something yet to be unveiled. By the end of the show, it ended up merely about government decision to cover up effectiveness of a vaccine for political reasons and how Laughing Man wanted to expose it all this time; no, seriously.
Also, there are Catcher in the Rye references, so many that it almost wants to make this book central to the character and motivation of Laughing Man and possibly Section 9 as well. I cannot say I hate Holden Clayfield (not sure if surname correct) as some people say, but Catcher in the Rye is certainly not among my favorite books. I think it's overrated.
Overall, it is a diverse and interesting series. I can recommend you watch it at least once, for rather intriguing plot. Resolution does not leave you satisfied but premise does keep you curious and there are cool fights and too. There is also a second double season that I will probably watch at some later date.
Overall Rating 6.8 out of 10 - Nice comedy that starts strong but goes astray halfway through.
I still recommend watching at least first dozen episodes.
Recently I watched a number of shows that begin very strong but then somehow lose their touch and become near shit closer to the end. First Toji no Miko, now this.Overall Rating 5.7 out of 10 - Flawed waifu show that barely works as intended
I can recommend watching if you have no better anime to watch
Even a talentless studio that has little idea what they are doing can sometimes produce something half-decent.Overall Rating 6.3 out of 10 - Decent show that begins really well and ends rather lackluster.
I recommend watching.
Cute girls, Japanese culture and aesthetics, pleated skirts, stockings and swordfights. A formula of near guaranteed success. That is why I was very enthusiastic about this show. Finally, something not feminist, subverting working formulas with unworking ones and such. Pure female exploitation for male enjoyment.Overall Rating 3.0 out of 10 - Season that betrays and retcons nearly everything from the original
I do not recommend watching.
Me complaining that 2nd and 3rd seasons do not live up to the original is nothing new. Sometimes it's just a minor issues and other times it's a completely deal breaking.
Unfortunately, 3rd season of Arknights manage to do the worst disservice to the original, changing nearly everything. It's a worse fall that even Kaiji's second season. What makes it worse is the fact that with Kaiji or Gochiusa one could have a benefit of the doubt that new creative team simply misunderstood the original work and fucked up unintentionally. With 3rd season of Arknights its clearly not the case. It was a fully intentional retcon to reframe the entire story as something altogether different.
First season of Arknights was a simple but likable waifu show, much in the mold of Kancolle or Dolls Frontline.
In addition to a collection of many cute women for every taste out there it had a simple but compelling and relatable plot. An infection called Oripathy infect certain people, giving them special abilities called arts. Common uninfected people fear the infected and discriminate against them.
Reunion wants revenge for the mistreatment they suffered. Rhodes instead wants to find ways for everyone live in peace somehow. Very on the zeitgeist as boomers and Gen W (early Gen X) ruined economy, betrayed Millennials and stole our future. Because of that one can relate to a Reunion's cause.
In contrast Rhodes, who is a protagonist, offers a number of nice, kind, accepting and forgiving females, something real life women clearly lacking nowadays. Rhodes is clearly a waifu garden for a discerning man.
Amiya clearly represents (or represented) all these qualities well enough. Her presence made half of the show. Rooting for Reunion to deal with all the uninfected the other.
First season was the truest to the cause, second season had some questionable parts but was on the level. Things really went south in the third one. To begin with most of the season are flashbacks. First, we see a Rhodes past. It was transformed into a fraction that fought for power in Ursus but lost, Theresia was killed and Rhodes went on to fight Reunion instead. That was followed by flashback about Talulah, who was retconned into an altruistic idealist who was helping poor and wanted to transform Ursus until loss of her best friend made her insane. All of it became inside Ursus conspiracy.
Characters and their motivations changed too. Amiya was transformed from kind and accepting girl into an enforcer of some abstract moral; creators try so hard to sell to viewers. Other characters changed too. I already explained Talulah, but doctor, Kalt'sit and Mephisto all have changed too. Patriot got a big role with his weird and contradictory ideals about who has right to speak or fight or whatnot. He is but another vehicle for authors to sell their views to public.
Until last episode I was willing to give it somewhere between 50 and 60 but conclusion was the worst possible. It was almost as if it deliberately tried to cover the bingo card of every single trope, I hate modern fiction for: justifying abuse, suffering and hardship, absurd levels of guilt, self-punishment, self-sacrifice, false justice, illogical arguments, stopping fight instead of resolving issue, avoiding the real problems and more. Causing people suffering is not making them stronger, it's a heinous crime whose perpetrators need to be stopped, by killing them if necessary.
All in all, this is unapologetic propaganda piece that tries hard to sell viewers its views and values. The question is whom these values benefit so much they would be willing to go out of their way to hamfist them into this story. The answer is old, rich and privileged.
Story deliberately tries to blame the victim by shifting blame from society to infected themselves. Allegedly it's not the world that treats infected unfairly but rather infected themselves who supposed to live to some higher standard none around them even bother to adhere.
Who benefit from this victim blaming message this season pushes so heavily. Obviously, the crooks themselves, people who steal your money and future now telling you to learn forgiveness and acceptance, blame yourself instead of those who wronged you.
Once again, the fiction hit close to the real life. Older generations who stole wealth of the younger ones in a Financial Crisis of 2008. Now they sit in their luxurious retirement homes paid by stolen wealth and fear consequences. Reunion reminds them of these consequences. They fear Millennials will organise like Reunion and pry back that stolen wealth from boomer's cold dead hands.
That is why older people sponsor this blatant rewriting of the story into propaganda. It is to preserve their stolen wealth and status that wealth allows them. That is why this season is not focused on changed but on preserving status quo. They might call it de-radicalisation but it's just another lie, a hypocrisy designed to protect the stolen wealth from those from whom it was stolen. Justice is not protecting status quo. Justice is taking this wealth back, not in letting the thieves keep it.
Our lives and our futures were stolen by boomers and Gen W (early Gen X), it's time we pry that back from their cold dead hands. They did not earn any of it, its paid for by the ever-increasing rents and ever decreasing salaries. Justice demands boomers pay for their theft, lies and other crimes.
Arknights: Enshin Shomei is a sequel that betrays the original cause of the show and twists it into toxic and unlikable tale. I do not recommend watching.